Journalist concerned by reporter pens missed Hillary’s rodeo

As Twitchy reported earlier, journalists in particular are giving very serious thought to the violent smack-down of a TIME photographer by a Secret Service agent providing security at a Donald Trump rally Monday, with some predicting that “real violence” at a Trump event is inevitable before this campaign cycle is finished.

After seeing the video, Nicholas Dawes of the Hindustan Times has some advice and questions for his American journalist friends.

For a distinguished and well-traveled journalist, Dawes had never heard of the press pen, so we’re assuming he missed this proud moment among his American journalist friends, on Independence Day, no less.

Why would the American press agree to be led around by young girls penning them in with some clothesline?

So what was the question again?

Doesn’t any of this news travel overseas? In case no one abroad has heard, Clinton has graduated from the rope to an extra level of Secret Service protection, as Fox News’ Ed Henry found out last month.

Read more:

Strange Bedfellows Tackle Measure Limiting Citizen Initiatives

DENVER – Colorado ballot Initiative 71, a move to make it harder to change the state’s constitution, has borne out the old adage that ‘politics makes for strange bedfellows.’

Jon Caldara, president of the Libertarian Independence Institute, says he’s never seen before a coalition like the one opposing the measure. It includes conservative and liberal economic, social justice and conservation groups.

Caldara says the groups share concerns about good governance and hope to block what he calls a “power grab” by politicians and industry groups.

“And it’s obvious that they want the power structure to be through them, not through the people,” Caldara states. “If 71 passes, only very, very wealthy interests will ever be able to get something on the ballot again.”

Proponents of 71 say they want to “raise the bar” for citizen-led amendments, which they say frequently conflict with existing law, by requiring signatures totaling at least 2 percent of residents in each of the state’s 35 Senate districts.

Opponents say that would make costs for future initiatives prohibitive, and argue a single district or even a couple of neighborhoods in dense urban districts could effectively veto policies supported by the rest of the state.

The new rules also would raise the voting threshold, if an initiative makes the ballot, from a simple majority to 55 percent of the vote.

Caldara says he’s concerned if Initiative 71 passes, it could be the last time Coloradans get to vote on amendments to the state constitution.

He explains laws or statutes passed by policymakers are examples of how government tells “we the people” what to do, and says ballot initiatives are a critical tool for standing up to special interests.

“But the Colorado Constitution is where ‘we the people’ tell the government what to do,” he states. “And sometimes, those people in power don’t like what ‘we the people’ tell them they have to live by.”

Without the state’s current initiative process, Colorado would not have implemented campaign finance rules, term limits, transparency or ethics laws, or legalized marijuana.

Groups opposing the measure include the Colorado Union of Taxpayers, the Colorado State Shooting Association, the Colorado Fiscal Institute and Common Cause.

Colorado News Connection  |  [email protected]

The post Strange Bedfellows Tackle Measure Limiting Citizen Initiatives appeared first on North Denver Tribune.

North Denver Tribune